Readers Voice their Opinions
The phenylephrine difference
To the editor: I've always enjoyed Neil Gailmard's "Management Tip of the Week," but one stands out far above all the others for me.
Some years ago, Dr. Gailmard suggested we consider instilling 2.5% phenylephrine at the pre-testing sequence's start to save time during the comprehensive eye exam. (See www.optometric.com/mtotw/tip.asp?tip=222.) It wasn't easy to get up the nerve to change something so basic as waiting until the exam was almost over before asking the patient's permission to dilate. But, once I got over my concerns — and carefully trained my technician — the pre-dilations went off without a hitch. Phenylephrine doesn't interfere with accommodation, so all nearpoint tests were possible. Also, it doesn't interfere with contact lens fittings. For patients visiting the optical area, we delayed tropicamide instillation until frame selection. Patients would wait an extra five or 10 minutes (while the order was being written up, for example) before the retinal exam. This saved a lot of time. If a full dilation was refused, the phenylephrine enlarged the pupil somewhat, which, of course, enhanced the "undilated" exam.
Nothing I've learned in my 28 years of practice has enhanced my practice efficiency as much as this process. OM
Margaret Placentra Johnston, O.D.
Please send us your lettersOptometric Management welcomes your letters. Letters must include the writer's name, daytime phone number and e-mail address. All letters become the property of Optometric Management (OM) and may be published in any medium. All correspondence is subject to editing in accordance with OM's guidelines for style and brevity. OM cannot guarantee that all letters will be published.
Please e-mail letters to email@example.com.
Optometric Management, Issue: October 2010