Optometric Management Tip # 297   -   Wednesday, October 03, 2007
Contact Lens Fees, Part 2

We covered the common terminology used in contact lens services last week, along with some basic definitions, but since definitions and office policies vary widely, we must try to compare apples to apples when we discuss services or quote fees. It's the little details and special situations that make contact lens fees challenging for doctors and staff members, so let's look at some hypothetical case examples in the coming weeks. How would you handle the following case?

Case example

An established, successful, daily wear contact lens patient is in for her annual exam. You routinely charge a comprehensive eye exam fee plus an additional contact lens evaluation fee. The patient presents no eye or vision complaints. No change in the Rx is found and the eyes are healthy. You discuss the benefits of silicone hydrogel lenses with the patient and offer to let her try the lenses at no extra charge. You put on a pair of diagnostic lenses; the fit looks fine and visual acuity is 20/20; the patient is intrigued; you dispense the lenses and tell her to call and let you know whether she wants her next supply of lenses to be the new ones or stay with the lenses she was previously using. You can order a new supply without seeing the patient back again. She calls back in a week, likes the lenses very much, but thinks the prescription may need to be adjusted a bit. She wants to come in for a recheck before ordering the full year supply. Do you charge her a progress exam fee for this next visit?

Points to consider Back to the original case

I would not charge a fee for a follow-up exam to recheck the contact lens power, based on the way this case was presented in the first place. I would handle this visit the same way I handle any patient complaint about a new prescription, whether it be for eyeglasses or contact lenses. We call these visits "Rx Trouble" or "CL Trouble" visits and there is no charge. If I elected to proceed without a fitting fee and without requiring follow-up visits at the initial exam, then the risk is on me if a problem arises. I would do well to monitor the frequency of such complaint events and if they seldom occur, there is no need to change my practice.

I've heard all the complaints that eye care seems to be the only health care field that's burdened with not always being paid for our time and the analogies with primary care physicians, who would still charge for a second visit even if the first antibiotic didn't work. But the reality is that the two professions are different and the public's perception and expectation is different. It's in our best interest to see complaint cases at no charge (within a reasonable time after a new Rx); I just roll that cost of doing business into my exam fees. Every eye care practice has patient complaints that warrant a recheck and I let my staff know that I want to see those patients. It's far more costly (to your reputation) to not see them!

Best wishes for continued success,

Neil B. Gailmard, OD, MBA, FAAO
Chief Optometric Editor, Optometric Management