The fee for a refraction can seem tricky from a management point of view, but it really is pretty simple once you adopt a few rules for your office. To set the framework, here is a recent question from a reader: I have never charged for a refraction separately because I've felt that this was part of a comprehensive exam. When and why do you charge a separate fee for refraction and does a patient ever question this?
Always charge and itemize
It is best to always charge for a refraction (assuming the test was done, of course) and show it as a separate line item fee on the patient's ledger and receipt. I would do this in all cases: private pay, vision plan coverage or medical insurance coverage. The refraction fee can then be billed to a third party or may be collected from the patient, depending on the coverage, but I believe the fee should always be entered. It is simply good policy.
Many doctors simply drop the refraction fee when they know it is not covered by insurance because they think it's a smart marketing move and they think the patient will object to the fee. In reality, these doctors are simply missing out on thousands of dollars per month in revenue. Patients do not object to refraction fees in my practice; they just pay them.
If the refraction fee is covered by the insurance plan, or if it is included in the definition of a comprehensive eye exam, there is no benefit at all to not charging for it. Even if it exceeds the maximum exam fee by a vision plan, you may as well enter the charge and just write it off later. At least the patient sees the value of the test.
How to quote the fee
When verbally quoting the exam fee to patients I train my staff to add the eye health exam fee and refraction fee together and state the one overall fee. We do this for simplicity. We always write up the two fees separately on the patient's visit slip and enter them separately into our computer system, but since the total comes out as quoted, we have zero complaints. Since refractions are required in our office as part of a complete eye exam (the patient can't opt out of it), we simply quote it as one fee. This is just my opinion, but I find it too cumbersome to explain two fees.
Perform a refraction with most exams
I view the refraction as a critical part of a complete eye exam and, as such, I do the test most of the time. If the patient has not had an exam in the past year, or if he is new to my office, I do a refraction even if there is no visual complaint. We have all seen significant refractive changes when there is no complaint. I gain useful information by knowing the true best corrected visual acuity, even if glasses are not prescribed. I don't think we are doing the patient a favor by not doing the test in order to save him the fee.
There are certainly some valid reasons to not perform a refraction and we all use our judgment about that. Many interim visits at three or six months do not need a refraction (but some do such as follow-up on a child). In some cases of infection or injury, the eye may not be in physical shape to allow a useful refraction.
When to not charge for refraction
The only time I do a refraction without charge is when I see a patient to troubleshoot a complaint about glasses or contacts.