earnings
Can
You Increase Your Fourth
Quarter Earnings?
Save
your time looking for a quick fix. It's time to plan your strategy for 2006.
JERRY HAYES, O.D., Ponte Vedra Beach,
Fla.
When
optometrists ask me for last-minute tips on increasing practice profits in the fourth
quarter my usual response is "Save your time and start working on next year." That's
because the key to developing a financially successful practice is planning. And
meaningful financial planning for your practice is something you must do before
the year gets started.
It's
like creating a game plan in football. Coaches put in a lot of work before kickoff
to develop a strategy their team can execute. But once the game starts, all they
can do is make adjustments. Therefore, now, not next fall, is the time to start
laying the groundwork for a more profitable 2006.
|
4
Types of Optometric Practices |
|
High net
(35%+)
Low $ volume
Less$500,000* |
High net
(35%+)
High $ volume
Over $500,000* |
Low net (-29%)
High $ volume
Over $500,000* |
Low net (-29%)
Low $ volume
Less $500,000* |
|
|
|
|
Where do I start?
To start your planning process, step back and look at your practice
from a strategic standpoint. How you position your practice in the marketplace should
dictate the fees you charge, your overhead expenses and your level of profitability.
Look at the illustration above to determine
which of the four strategic types your practice currently falls into.
What's your strategy?
Let's examine the options. The high-net, high-gross quadrant is
the goal of most independent optometrists. Because this type of practice never happens
by accident, we know the owner has spent time developing a strategy for his practice.
Likewise, high-net, low-gross practices, are usually created by design and are often
just a younger version of a high-net, high-gross practice waiting to grow up.
Low-net, high-gross practices are also usually the result of a
conscious strategy. This is an approach commonly employed by discount chains and
can be very profitable given enough volume. However, the low-net, high-gross strategy
is difficult for independent O.D.s to execute successfully. Low-net, low-volume
is a strategy few optometrists choose for themselves. This scenario generally indicates
a very new practice just getting started; an older practice in decline; or a practice
with no clear strategy for financial success.
While it's easy to say a high-gross, high-net strategy is the
best, this may not be the case for everyone. In reality, the best strategy is the
one that you can successfully execute. The worst strategy is having no conscious
practice strategy at all.
Choosing your strategy
The overhead profile of your practice must be consistent with
your financial strategy. You can't expect to attract patients by charging high fees
if all you offer is a dumpy office and bare bones staff. Nor will you be profitable
if you offer discount prices and try to provide full-service care with a big staff
in plush surroundings. They just don't go together.
Let's look at a practice with
"average" fees and overhead, based on AOA survey results. Dr. Middleton grosses
$600,000 and sees 2,000 primary exams per year for an average of $300 per patient.
His overhead structure is given in the table on the right.
Now compare that with the overhead of
Dr. Hightower's high-net practice. He sees 1,500 primary exams per year and grosses
$600,000; an average of $400 per patient.
What's different? Two things: Dr. Hightower spends
less on cost of goods but more on staff. Cost of goods is a lower percentage of
gross because the high-net practice sees fewer patients but charges higher fees.
Despite higher margins, Dr. Hightower spends more on staff than Dr. Middleton because
this supports his strategy to provide a higher level of service.
The point is this: The most financially successful practice
owners work to execute a conscious strategy in their practice. And it's important
the practice budget be designed to support the practice strategy.
|
|
|
| |
Dr.
Middleton's Overhead
Cost
of goods sold 33% $200,000
Staff salaries and benefits 20% $120,000
Occupancy costs 6% $36,000
Patient care equipment 3% $18,000
Marketing 2% $12,000
General office overhead 6% $36,000
Practice net 30% $180,000
Dr. Hightower's Overhead
Cost of goods sold 28% $168,000
Staff salaries and benefits 22% $132,000
Occupancy costs 6% $36,000
Patient care equipment 3% $18,000
Marketing 1% $6,000
General office overhead 5% $30,000
Practice net 35% $210,000
Dr. Dowell's Overhead
Gross $575,000
COGS 33% 189,750
Staff 22% 126,500
Occupancy 6% 34,500
Equipment 5% 28,750
Marketing 3% 17,250
General Overhead 6% 34,500
Total expenses 75% $431,250
Net 25% $143,750 |
|
|
Creating a practice budget
Let's look at a fictitious optometrist we will call Dr. David
Dowell. Dr. Dowell has a solid practice that is on track to gross $575,000 in 2005
and net 25%, or $143,750. His overhead structure is in the chart below.
After joining a study group with some successful colleagues, Dr.
Dowell realizes he has a low- net, high-volume practice, even with a nice office
and a well-trained staff. In other words, his financial results are not consistent
with the quality of service he provides. What can he do?
Create a financial plan
Since we already know the answer is for Dr. Dowell to develop
a financial plan for his practice, the only question now is where to start. Projecting
gross income and practice expenses are important, but the key financial goal to
establish is really net income. Therefore, we will ask Dr. Dowell to come up with
a realistic but ambitious goal for 2006. What would you propose Dr. Dowell net in
2006: $175,000, $200,000, $225,000?
Dr. Dowell decides he wants to increase his net to $200,000 in
2006. I recommend every practice owner begin the planning process with the end in
mind. Now let's work backwards to see how he can get there.
Based on his gross of $575,000 in 2005, what is a realistic gross
income goal for 2006 that will support Dr. Dowell's net income goal of $200,000?
A gross of $600,000 would represent only a 4% growth in dollar volume and seems
very reasonable for him to achieve.
Do the math
If Dr. Dowell sets $600,000 as the budget for his gross income
and $200,000 as the budget for his net, his practice overhead can be only $400,000
(gross – net = practice overhead).
Believe it or not, Dr. Dowell just created a macro budget for
his practice. See, this isn't rocket science! Now he must develop a detailed budget
for expenses that supports the net income goal.
If you're wondering where the hard part comes in, this is it;
getting into the nitty-gritty details of overhead expenses. To do this, we advise
Dr. Dowell analyze his 2005 overhead and use that information as the basis to create
an expense budget in 2006. This is more accounting than Dr. Dowell wants to do and
he's not particularly good at it, either. So, we encourage him to get his office
bookkeeper or outside accountant to help him work through the process.
Look at each expense area
Here is a process Dr. Dowell can use to analyze cost of goods.
His biggest expense was 33% of his gross, or $189,750, in 2005. Dr. Dowell should
begin analysis with a meeting of all staff who are involved in ordering frames,
spectacle lenses, contact lenses and related supplies, as well as frame stylists
and receptionists, who quote and collect fees.
Typical questions to consider:
- Are we consolidating our purchases in order to get the
best possible discounts?
- Do we keep more inventory than we need?
- Is there an area of unusually high waste, such as the cutting
and edging lab, where we might do well to review our processes?
- Have we adjusted our materials fees to keep up with increased
lab costs?
- And the biggest question, do we have to raise fees to meet
our net income goals?
Once this review is complete, Dr. Dowell (and you) needs to analyze
his other five key expense areas in a similar manner to determine what needs to
happen for that particular expense area to meet its 2006 budget. If you and your
staff haven't gone through this process in the last few years, you'll quickly find
many ways to cut expenses and be more efficient.
Ultimately, a detailed budget should resemble the table above.
Once Dr. Dowell has his budget in place, he can use it on a monthly
basis throughout 2006 to drive spending decisions in all his key expense areas,
as well as help decide when it's time to raise fees and by how much. Now, just like
a coach, he may have to make adjustments as the year goes on. But at least he has
a game plan in place.
|
Detailed budget |
|
|
Gross $600,000
COGS 30% 180,000
Staff 20% 120,000
Occupancy 6% 36,000
Equipment 4% 28,750
Marketing 2% 12,000
General Overhead 5% 30,000
Total expenses 67% $400,000
Net of: 33% $200,000
|
|
|
|
Nowhere to cut?
If you're already keeping a close watch on your budget, it may
be very difficult to cut expenses. If that's the case there may be only one other
way to raise your profit margins: Increase your fees to private patients.
In this example, if Dr. Dowell raised his fees 9.8% and grossed
$631,250 with the same overhead of $431,250, he would achieve his goal of netting
$200,000. As you can see, sometimes all it takes is some expense control or a modest
fee increase to dramatically increase your net profits. In the real world, it usually
takes a combination of both.
Doctor or businessman?
Many O.D.s tell me they went to optometry school to be a doctor,
not to develop strategy and budgets. Optometry is our profession, but like it or
not, your practice is a business. If you want to be a financially successful practice
owner in these days of intense corporate competition and pressure from managed care,
you really don't have a choice. You have to learn how to apply basic business principals
to managing your practice if you want to thrive for the long term.
Dr.
Hayes is the founder of Hayes
Marketing, HMI Buying Group and e-dr. Network. He authors OM's Business Advisor
column and is a frequent speaker and writer on the business side of practice. He
may be reached at jhayes@hayesconsulting.com.
Optometric Management, Issue: October 2005